PDA

View Full Version : Dean Says Superdelegates Must Choose Sides Before Convention


Polly
04-01-2008, 07:17 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20080401/pl_bloomberg/ajsmmwnhy9u

Nadine Elsibai and Michael McKee
Tue Apr 1, 3:09 PM ET



April 1 (Bloomberg) -- Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said he'll keep pressing party superdelegates who haven't yet declared support for either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton to choose sides once the last presidential primary is over.

"The only thing that's going to keep us from winning is disunity in the Democratic Party,'' Dean said in a Bloomberg Television interview today. "We've got to bring this to an orderly close at the right time.''

He rejected an idea being promoted by Tennessee Governor Philip Bredesen to hold a superdelegate convention to select the party's nominee after the last primary on June 3.

With 10 contests remaining in the nomination race, neither Obama nor Clinton is likely to win enough pledged delegates to secure the nomination. That will leave the decision in the hands of 794 so-called superdelegates, party officials and officeholders who vote at the national convention and aren't bound by results in caucuses and primaries.

About 470 superdelegates are publicly supporting either Obama or Clinton. Dean said he wants those who haven't declared to ``make their wishes known well before the convention'' is held Aug. 25-28. That way the party can focus on the general-election campaign against Republican John McCain, he said.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today echoed Dean's call.

"I do think that it is important for us to get behind one candidate a long time before we go to the Democratic National Convention,'' the California Democrat said on ABC's "Good Morning America'' program.

Candidates in Pennsylvania

Clinton and Obama are campaigning today in Pennsylvania, which will have 158 pledged delegates at stake in a primary on April 22. Clinton, a senator from New York, is vowing to stay in the race even if the fight carries into the convention.

Obama, an Illinois senator, has 1,414 pledged delegates won in primaries and caucuses so far to Clinton's 1,250, according to an unofficial tally by the Associated Press. She leads in the number of superdelegate endorsements, 256 to 218, according to lists supplied by the campaigns and interviews.

A candidate needs 2,024 delegates to win the nomination. That doesn't include delegates from Florida and Michigan, two states stripped of their votes at the convention for holding early primaries.

Clinton told members of the AFL-CIO labor federation today that she will create 3 million new jobs with her plan to improve the nation's infrastructure.

"We're trying to run today's economy on yesterday's infrastructure,'' she said in Philadelphia. "We are jeopardizing America's prosperity...''

Lori
04-02-2008, 05:12 AM
I agree that it's probably best if the superdelegates commit to a candidate well before the convention.

gr8mommy
04-02-2008, 08:00 AM
I don't understand why. Isn't that the original purpose of the conventions---to choose the candidate? I think it would be much more meaningful to be an actual part of the process than to be just an expensive, unnecessary pep rally.

freebiemom
04-02-2008, 09:14 AM
I agree with Denise. I am looking forward to a convention that actually has a purpose - it's the first time I can remember it happening in my voting years. I've always thought the conventions were a big waste of money and time. All the money put into them could be used for so many things - schools being at the top of my list.

Lori
04-02-2008, 09:47 AM
I don't understand why. Isn't that the original purpose of the conventions---to choose the candidate? I think it would be much more meaningful to be an actual part of the process than to be just an expensive, unnecessary pep rally.

I think it mainly has to do with timing. If both parties were going to be choosing their candidates at the conventions, it would be less of an issue, but if the Democrats wait until August to finalize the candidate, that gives several more months for divisions to fester, while the Republicans have six or seven more months than the Democrats to build support for McCain. I'd rather have people know as soon as possible who the candidate will be, and have the convention be a time of bringing the party together behind that candidate, and maybe working out a platform that satisfies most of the party, rather than something that is going to end with a lot of bitter feelings.

gr8mommy
04-02-2008, 11:26 AM
I think it will end with bitter feelings no matter when the decision comes, Lori.

Lori
04-02-2008, 01:41 PM
I think it will end with bitter feelings no matter when the decision comes, Lori.

I'm sure there will be, but given enough time, people usually come behind a candidate. A lot of Republicans were really upset about McCain and unhappy he got the nomination, but most of the players who are usually in line have been falling into line behind him, and that will probably continue to happen. I think the longer Clinton and Obama keep going at it, the more rancor that will be created, and the less time there will be between the decision and the election for people to calm down and for cooler heads to prevail. I'd just like to see voters in November making decisions based upon the platforms of the candidates on the ballot, and not staying home because of hard feelings about how the nomination process went. Time does seem to be the biggest factor in appeasing people in situations like this, so I think the Democratic Party will be better off if people have as much time as possible to accept the candidate (without feeling like their preferred candidate was prematurely knocked out of the running).

This is not really OT, but I'm shocked by the number of voters who say they'll stay home if the Democratic candidate they don't support doesn't get the nomination. I think, from a statistic I heard on one of the Sunday news shows, that it's nearly 20% of Clinton supporters and nearly 20% of Obama supporters. To me, that seems very self-defeating, to stay home because your candidate didn't get the nod when the future of many people will be affected by the election. At least show up and write in the candidate you wanted. But I really, really hope that people don't let bitterness about the nomination keep them from voting at all.